Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines Case Study Essay

Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines Case Study - Essay ExampleHowever, this may curb been counterproductive, because the airline could have then argued that there is no connection because of the different industries. The main additional source that it seems the federation missed, was to look at national airlines as a comparison, or else of just looking at other feeder airlines.The union had several primary objectives which they wanted the company to face and on which they thought they could bargain productively. get-go of all, there was the issue of raising wages. The line of achievement attendants wanted a higher hourly rate. Also, there was the objective of increasing job security, particularly to protect flight attendants with a lot of seniority from being fired or laid off by the airline. In addition to job security, the union also wanted expanded vacation and leave time, as well as better working conditions. Another objective of the union was to change the duty rig system. In the duty rig system, a flight attendant may spend a 15 hour day, commuting to an airport, waiting for the flight, and running checks, but plainly get paid 6 hours, because in the duty rig system, they are only paid for time that the airplane is in the air. This seemed unfair to union representatives.The unions strategies can be separated into three categoriesinform, involve, and convince. In the inform stage, the strategy was to keep union members as well informed as contingent as to what was going on with the collective bargaining negotiations. In the involve strategy, the union aimed to optimize union membership participation by encouraging activities such(prenominal) as picketing and mini-strikes. Finally, the third strategy concentrated on convincing the airline of their grievances, and not backing down from their objectives. These strategies were more than reasonablethe only real military force a union has is to withhold work.Magic Carpets goals were to preser ve the status quo, and to save money. They did not want to give in to union